Friday, July 7, 2017

While Jawbone closes, Jawbone Health Hub opens

Sad to hear that Jawbone is closing. While I enjoyed using their fitness tracking hardware, I was more impressed by their data and analytics capabilities to keep users engaged in their health. 

I owned a few of the Jawbone UP fitness trackers. One stopped working, so I ended up getting a replacement. A button fell off the other. 

Jawbone Health Hub is a new digital health startup that is launching as Jawbone closes its doors. According to several sources, it sounds like a number of former Jawbone employees are following the CEO to this new startup. If they build a lean team and have access to the wealth of user-generated health data from Jawbone, then this startup could gain value very quickly. I was always impressed by the way that Jawbone nudged users with health tips, relevant articles, tips/suggestions, and tailored feedback.

Good luck to the new Jawbone Health Hub!

Thursday, June 1, 2017

Newer Android Wear devices emphasizing fitness

I'm so glad to see that the newer Android Wear devices are emphasizing fitness. By offering meaningful water resistance, users can now wear these devices when swimming, surfing, etc. In fact, the newer watches are placing tremendous pressure on traditional GPS running watches. If you don't need battery life stamina to run ultramarathons, then the newer Android Wear devices may suffice for the average fitness enthusiast who wishes to go on runs, train at the gym, and compete in occasional events.

From the Huawei Watch 2 to the Tag Heuer Connected 45, you can get all types of water resistant smartwatches that will help you take your fitness to the next level.

Wednesday, February 8, 2017

Android Wear 2.0 is a welcome upgrade

Google just announced Android Wear 2.0 and the LG Watch Sport and the LG Watch Style are two new watches that are being released with the upgraded operating system. The Watch Sport includes a built-in cellular radio (LTE) so that you can use the watch without your phone. However, it's a much larger watch.
Some of the older Android Wear watches will receive an update to 2.0, but it seems to me that the best features of 2.0 are built around the internal cellular radio.

The LG Watch Sport includes a built-in GPS and optical heart rate monitor. So, it could be a really nice running watch for people who want to leave their phone behind and still stay connected to the rest of the world. The real usability test will depend on battery life: can you go on an extended run while using the GPS, LTE, and heart rate monitor?

Friday, January 20, 2017

Garmin fenix 5 - the smartwatch for serious fitness users

The new Garmin fenix 5 comes in 3 case sizes:
  • 42 mm
  • 47 mm
  • 51 mm
Garmin has essentially taken the successes of the fenix 3 and extended the fitness smartwatch to a wider audience. Unlike the Apple Watch or Android Wear, the Garmin fenix 5 does not have a touch screen. It also does not have a microphone.

The fenix 5 is meant for serious fitness users who need a robust, water resistant (100 meters) watch that has extended battery life. The wrist-based heart rate eliminates the need for a chest strap. The fenix 5 is positioned as a "premium" multisport GPS watch that starts at $599 and goes all the way up to $850.

Garmin will be expanding its ecosystem of apps through its Connect IQ store.

Nixon and Casio have released rugged Android Wear watches that are water resistant, but relatively short battery life still remains a limiting factor. With the release of Android Wear 2.0, we're going to see more smartwatches that have cellular capabilities.

Thursday, December 22, 2016

Apple Outlet now selling refurbished Apple watches

If you missed the recent Black Friday deals on the Apple Watch, you can find discounted models on the online Apple store in the "certified refurbished" section (some may call it the Apple Outlet). You'll find refurbished Series 1 and Series 2 models. These refurbished watches come with a 1-yr warranty and the inventory is constantly being updated.

Friday, September 23, 2016

My critique of the JAMA activity tracker + weight loss study

Many people have seen reports of the recent JAMA study titled, "Effect of Wearable Technology Combined With a Lifestyle Intervention on Long-term Weight Loss: The IDEA Randomized Clinical Trial." Published in Sept, 2016, this study would appear to be a reflection of recent trends in activity tracking and weight loss strategies. However, the study used an antiquated wearable device that is no longer sold (the BodyMedia FIT which is worn on the upper arm) and it was conducted from 2010-2012. How many people in 2010 were wearing activity trackers? The popular Fitbit Flex launched in May 2013. The Apple Watch launched in April 2015.

Back in 2010, relatively few people wore activity trackers. Moreover, hardly anyone wore them on their upper arm. So although the authors acknowledge that "The multisensor wearable device was worn on the upper arm, which may not reflect the effectiveness of more contemporary devices worn on the wrist..."

The term "effectiveness" is an interesting term for this type of study, since the accuracy of worn activity trackers has wide variability. In order for a digital tool to effectively change behavior in a sustainable way, people have to use it regularly and the device should provide useful feedback to the user.

I've personally tried the BodyMedia Fit and I can attest that:

  1. It draws a lot of attention (maybe not as much as Google Glass, but you'll get a lot of questions from random strangers asking, "what is that on your arm?"). How self-conscious would you be if were constantly telling everyone that you were taking part of a weight loss study? 
  2. It's not something you'll be wearing 24/7 (fabric stretch band around the arm, so you probably won't be taking a shower with it, plus I don't believe that it was water resistant) - so that can impact daily adherence. Plus, the device needs to be charged on a regular basis.
  3. The tracker is not very comfortable (imagine strapping a pager to your upper arm all day). 
  4. The device doesn't really provide any type of useful feedback such as vibration alerts, cues, smart notifications, etc. You may eventually forget that it's there. It's not nearly as engaging as modern activity trackers that have lights, screens, and vibrating alerts.

The authors also state, "the use of wearable technology was not initiated at the onset of the intervention, which may have influenced how the participants adopted and used the technology during their weight loss efforts..." Many people are missing this point. Adoption and engagement are critical factors that can impact the success of any type of sustainable behavior change.

So, if the goal is to sustain lasting behavior changes that will lead to weight loss and healthy eating, then you need to study devices that people will easily wear daily, devices that will provide useful feedback in real-time, and devices that won't make people self-conscious about their attempt to lose weight.

Finally, keep in mind that the study began with intensive weight loss interventions for 6 months (weekly group sessions), then the groups continued to participate in monthly group sessions (and received phone calls, text message reminders, etc.) Most people who choose to purchase and use a wearable device don't gain access to this type of support and structure. Most consumers are curious or they may be in a contemplative stage where they want to see how an activity tracker may help them achieve a healthier lifestyle.

Intensive, structured weight loss programs are great ways to kick-start a new journey towards healthy living, but people need to be taught how to use tools in a way that is natural to their workflow and daily habits. If you're not accustomed to strapping a large device to your arm, then you'll be one of the first ones to stop using the device after a few weeks or months. In contrast, if you normally wear a watch and use a smartphone, then it'll be much easier to wear a device that is simple and that provides useful feedback (such as smart notifications that you can customize so that you don't run into alert fatigue).

In many ways, it's unfortunate that the JAMA article was positioned by the media as a disappointment regarding the "effectiveness" of wearable technology. It's unfortunate that many consumers may now have a misconception regarding how their activity trackers may benefit them.

I'm sure we'll see many more studies in the near future assessing the "effectiveness" of modern activity trackers. Until then, we'll have to wait patiently as people read stories with misleading titles like, "Activity Trackers Are Ineffective at Sustaining Weight Loss" or "Weight Loss On Your Wrist? Fitness Trackers May Not Help" (the BodyMedia device was worn on the arm, not the wrist!)

Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Polar M600 Android Wear fitness smartwatch - waterproof, GPS, optical HR, touch screen

The upcoming Polar M600 is the type of Android Wear fitness smartwatch that I've been waiting for. Waterproof. GPS. Touch screen. Optical HR. Made by Polar.

At a glance, it may somewhat resemble the Polar V800 or M400, but don't be fooled. The M600 is a modular Android Wear that is suitable for swimming (thanks to its novel proprietary charging connector) and incorporates Polar Smart Coaching features to help you achieve your optimal fitness performance. You can swap color bands.

There aren't that many waterproof Android Wear watches that are suitable for swimming. If you don't need that level of water resistance, then you'll probably be fine with other Android Wear watches like the Moto 360 Sport. However, if you're looking for a serious fitness smartwatch that can handle the swimming pool, then wait for the M600.